Insight Series: Did you hire your best people to audit AI outputs?
77% of daily users saying they “audit AI work with the same or more rigor than human work. Are your best people spending more time validating AI outputs than doing the work only they can do?
There is an irony nobody talks about when the AI adoption announcement goes out. The employees who leaned in fastest are now the ones cleaning up the most. Workday put a number on it. 77% of daily users say they "audit AI work with the same or more rigor than human work."
We see this firsthand. Our high performers became the safety net. Not by choice. Because they are the only ones with the judgment to catch what is wrong.
AI has a place in low value repeatable work. But point it at high expertise tasks without proper training or validation and the gains reverse. And quietly, over time, something worse happens. The expertise itself starts to erode.
That is the part that does not show up on the efficiency dashboard.
Can this over time, feel less like high-impact work and more like constant cleanup?
